Decision Governance Infrastructure
Asplenz builds systems for governing and proving organizational decisions.
AI systems accelerate action.
Organizations remain accountable.
Two products address two distinct governance layers.
Layer 1
Govern operational decisions
Asplenz Knowledge
Structure architectural decisions, rules, and invariants.
Let agents check them before acting.
Govern exceptions.
Trace usage.
Who
CTO, Engineering, Platform
When
Every PR, every deploy, every architectural change
Purpose
Make the decision surface explicit and operational
Layer 2
Prove critical commitments
Evidence
Seal legally significant decisions as immutable, cryptographically verifiable facts.
Generate independently verifiable proof artifacts.
Who
Legal, Compliance, CISO
When
Regulatory audit, incident review, contractual dispute
Purpose
Make accountability defensible
Independent products. Shared philosophy.
| Feature | Knowledge | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Operational governance | Legal-grade proof |
| Data scope | All engineering decisions | Critical commitments only |
| Mutability | Versioned and editable | Immutable and sealed |
| Buyer | Engineering leadership | Legal / Compliance |
| Dependency | None | None |
A client can use Knowledge without Evidence.
A client can use Evidence without Knowledge.
Together, they form a complete decision governance infrastructure.
When they intersect
Sometimes an operational decision becomes legally significant.
In those cases, it may be sealed in Evidence.
But this is optional - not structural.
Why this matters
AI accelerates execution.
Decision governance must scale accordingly.
Asplenz provides both:
- Structured decision governance
- Cryptographic proof infrastructure
Two layers. One philosophy: decisions are assets.